Legal Opinion
Piaskoski & Associates v. Ricciardi
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 1, 2004No. 03-0009PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEININGER, EJ.
¶ 1. Carl Ricciardi appeals a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment to his former law firm, Fiaskoski & Associates. The trial court concluded that Ricciardi and the firm had entered into a valid contract to equally divide attorney fees received in certain cases Ricciardi took with him when he left employment with the Fiaskoski firm. Ricciardi claims the trial court erred in determining that an enforceable contract existed and in failing to declare the contract void on public policy grounds because it violated SCR 20:1.5(e) (2001-02). The law firm…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hartung v. HartungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Holstein v. GrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Maynard v. Port Publications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Carroll v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- McLellan v. CharlyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- Southeast Wisconsin Professional Baseball Park District v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN v. MitsubishiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.