Legal Opinion
Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 2007No. 2004AP2655PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 1. The issue presented in this review is whether plaintiffs may reopen their case and amend their complaint after the circuit court has dismissed the complaint in its entirety on the merits and the dismissal has been affirmed on appeal. The court of appeals reversed the circuit court's determination that it could not reopen the case to amend the complaint on these facts without a clear directive from the court deciding the appeal. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc. (Tietsworth III), 2006 WI App 5, 288 Wis. 2d 680, 709 N.W.2d 901. After carefully reviewing the facts, the statutory and case…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Schaefer v. IndyMac Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'n Ex Rel. Kopfman v. KopfmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- State v. Abbott LaboratoriesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- 5 Walworth, LLC v. Engerman Contracting, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- McConley v. T. C. Visions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.