Legal Opinion

Fleshman v. Whiteside

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1934PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiff to foreclose his own and two assigned mechanics’ liens. From a decree foreclosing the liens on certain personal property for the amount found due plaintiff from the Willamette Petroleum Syndicate, all the defendants except Clarence J. Whiteside and May White-side, who are not shown to have any interest in that property, prosecute this appeal.

The two principal questions here presented involve the construction of § 51-107, Oregon Code 1930, reading as follows:

“No lien provided for in this act shall bind any building, structure, or other improvement for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. North Side Sash & Door Co. v. HechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Peterson v. DillonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Davis v. BartzWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City Sash & Door Co. v. BunnWashington Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Diamond National Corp. v. DwelleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. AAA Fencing Co. v. Raintree Development & Energy Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Peters v. DonaWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Platts v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API