Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 23, 1930:

Fairchild, J.

The purpose of the workmen’s compensation legislation is to place the burden of payment for disability resulting from accident and occupational disease upon the industry which caused the disability. There must be some causal relationship between the accident or the disease and the work of the employment. There is no rule of law which attempts to shift this burden to a subsequent employer who has in no way caused or contributed to the disability, accident, or disease. The contention that a rule has been suggested in Schaefer & Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. McCarthy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. North End Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Walsh v. KotlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Milwaukee Malleable & Grey Iron Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API