Legal Opinion · Dissent

Milwaukee Malleable & Grey Iron Works v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1936Published

1DissentFairchild, J.

The statutes, as they were before the amendment of 1933, did not provide for an award *248in such a case as this. The trend of opinion as reflected in legislation and judicial opinion, was toward the recognition of a relationship between employer and employee under certain circumstances that amounted to a status, and it was indicated in decisions in this court that this status might be the •basis of a valid claim during intervals when the employee was not actually present at his work. This court, so far as it could with propriety, suggested needed legislation. In 1933, sec. 102.01 (2), Stats.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Nolan v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. North End Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API