Legal Opinion

Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

The award of the Industrial Commission was entered against three employers, each a separate amount, and appellants’ first contention is that the Commission is without authority to find total compensation and then divide the liability between several employers.

This is a case of first impression. We are cited to no precedent in this country for the action of the Commission. Lees v. Waring & Gillow, Ltd. 127 L. T. J. 498, 2 Butterworth’s W. C. C. 474, an English case, is cited as authority for the action of the Commission, but it has no bearing. There the act provided for apportioning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Bergeron's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. O'Donnell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. Parker v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Acme Body Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. North End Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API