Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
The award of the Industrial Commission was entered against three employers, each a separate amount, and appellants’ first contention is that the Commission is without authority to find total compensation and then divide the liability between several employers.
This is a case of first impression. We are cited to no precedent in this country for the action of the Commission. Lees v. Waring & Gillow, Ltd. 127 L. T. J. 498, 2 Butterworth’s W. C. C. 474, an English case, is cited as authority for the action of the Commission, but it has no bearing. There the act provided for apportioning…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Bergeron's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- O'Donnell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Parker v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
3Cited by15 opinions
- Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Acme Body Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- North End Foundry Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.