People v. Cox
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order denying a new trial. Benjamin K. Knight, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
As we understand this case, from an inspection of the record and the briefs, the facts are substantially' these: The defendant was charged with the crime of grand larceny. The alleged subject matter of the larceny was a horse, charged in the information to have been stolen in the city and county of San Francisco, and driven through San Mateo and other counties into the county of Santa Cruz. The defendant was found in the latter county in the possession of the horse. He there sold the horse under the name of J. Geary; he requested that the check for the payment of the horse be "made…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. VidalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Curreri v. ViceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- People v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.