Legal Opinion

Siedlik v. Stanley Works, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 29, 2002No. CIV.00-40429PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint [docket entry 30]. The Court held a hearing on this matter on March 27, 2002. For the reasons set forth below, the Court shall grant Plaintiffs motion and, sua sponte, remand the case to the Circuit Court for the County of Wayne.

I BACKGROUND

On December 6, 2000, Plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint in the Circuit Court for the County of Wayne alleging various state law claims against Defendant grounded in the Defendant’s allegedly-negligent design of die carts. In essence,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lynn Sinay, David Rosenberg (90-4075) and Aline Halye (91-3051) v. The Lamson & Sessions Company Russell Every John Schulze and Gene BuddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Laura Hollister, American Community Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. Dayton Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Weisbord v. Michigan State UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. J. Lewis Cooper Co. v. Diageo North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  3. Coleman v. Maxwell Shoe Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. Peguese v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  5. Kraft v. DR. LEONARD'S HEALTHCARE CORP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API