Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Maxwell Shoe Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 20, 2007No. Civil 06-10366PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [dkt 27] and Defendant J.C. Penney’s motion for summary judgment [dkt 20]. Both parties have filed responses and replies. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers and the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D.Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motions be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs motion…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Laura Hollister, American Community Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. Dayton Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Croskey v. BMW of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Curry v. MEIJER, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kraft v. DR. LEONARD'S HEALTHCARE CORP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Konstantinov v. Findlay Ford Lincoln MercuryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Croskey v. BMW of N AmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.