Legal Opinion

Ledesma v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 26, 1984No. 682-83, 683-83PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Judge.

After trial before the court, appellants’ were convicted of failing to identify themselves to a peace officer and assessed punishment by fine of one hundred twenty-five dollars each. In a published opinion, the Austin Court of Appeals reversed the convictions on the basis of insufficient evidence. Ledesma v. State, 652 S.W.2d 579 (Tex.App.—Austin 1983). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to review the Court of Appeals’ construction of these cases as “agreed” cases governed by Rule 263 of the Texas Rules…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Ledesma v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
  3. Todd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
  4. Presley v. City of BenbrookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Reaves v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API