Ledesma v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Judge.
After trial before the court, appellants’ were convicted of failing to identify themselves to a peace officer and assessed punishment by fine of one hundred twenty-five dollars each. In a published opinion, the Austin Court of Appeals reversed the convictions on the basis of insufficient evidence. Ledesma v. State, 652 S.W.2d 579 (Tex.App.—Austin 1983). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review to review the Court of Appeals’ construction of these cases as “agreed” cases governed by Rule 263 of the Texas Rules…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ledesma v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
3Cited by130 opinions
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
- Todd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- Presley v. City of BenbrookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Reaves v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.