Harrison v. State

OPINION

YANEZ, Justice.

Appellants were indicted for the state jail felony offense of taking a wildlife resource without the consent of the landowner. 1 See Tex. Pakks & Wild. Code Ann. § 61.022 (Vernon Supp.2002). Both appellants moved to quash their indictments. When the court denied the appellants’ motions, they pleaded nolo contendere. In one point of error, appellants now argue that the trial court erred by denying their motions to quash the indictments. Because the point of error raised by each appellant and the facts surrounding each appellant’s appeal are identical, we will address them…