Barrington v. Cokinos
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.'
Between them, the City of Beaumont, which is a home-rule city, and the State of Texas have agreed to finance the removal of a span of Missouri Pacific Railroad’ Company’s railroad from its present location in the City to another. The City is to furnish the new right of way and is to pay all other expense of the project in excess of $550,000. The State, through its Highway Department, is to have the work done and is to contribute $550,000 toward the expense of it.
The new right of way is to be adjacent", to, and in part is to be, right of way that, is now held by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Bailey v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Brooke v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Beaumont v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Barrington v. CokinosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Mallek v. City of San BenitoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.