Legal Opinion

State v. Stone

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1954No. 4953PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

The State seeks reimbursement out of the estate of Walter J. Mills, deceased, for the cost of supporting, maintaining and treating George Mills, an adult son of the decedent, in the Austin State Plospital. Walter J. Mills never at any time expressly agreed, either in writing or orally, to reimburse the State any part of such cost; and the State relies altogether on the provisions of Article 3196a, V.A.C.S., as the basis for the right asserted by it. We here quote the provisions of the statute which will require discussion in this opinion:

“Section 1. Patients admitted to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Sullivan v. Associated Billposters & Distributors of United States & CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lauraine v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1917

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State of California, Department of Mental Hygiene v. CopusTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Glover v. Union Pacific Railroad, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Vial v. Gas Solutions, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. Southern Pacific Transport Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Campbell v. MacGREGOR MEDICAL ASS'N, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API