Legal Opinion

People v. Josey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of conviction, although warranted by the evidence, must be reversed since we are constrained to find coercive the trial court’s remarks and instructions to the jury when it reported a failure to agree upon a verdict. The jurors commenced their deliberations at 11:00 A.M., continued them after going out for lunch and at 5:40 p.m. reported that they could not agree, The trial epurt then, quite properly, instructed them that it was their *661“ duty to agree upon a verdict, if that can be done without a violation of your conscientious convictions.” The jury again retired, later went out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mead v. City of Richland CenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Cook v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Acunto v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Decker v. SchumacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hill v. EdingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API