Decker v. Schumacher
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.
The only question here for decision is whether the jurors were coerced by the court into rendering a verdict, as a result of which a new trial should he granted.
This is a damage suit arising out of a collision between two automobiles, As usual, the essential issues of fact submitted to the jury were whether the defendant was guilty of negligence and, if so, whether plaintiff Chester A. Decker was guilty of contributory negligence. Testimony was received from witnesses for each of the parties, the conflicting testimony disclosed the usual sharp issues of fact, and the casB was submitted to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Eggleston v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. De MeauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Zeitz v. MaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. PizzinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Orr v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- In Re SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Janssen v. Carolina Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- Witt v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.