People v. Carter
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Following several hours of deliberation, it was announced that the jury had reached a guilty verdict on all counts. Upon polling the jury, however, it was revealed that one juror, the foreman, had not voted a guilty verdict. The court informed the jury that they would be required to deliberate further since the verdict was unacceptable for lack of unanimity. Upon the foreman’s inquiry concerning "What could be done if one or a few jurors cannot be convinced”, the court made the following remarks: "It is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. SavvidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- People v. AliceaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. . FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People v. LovelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- People v. TassielloNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. MoultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. PapernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.