Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Morningside, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 8, 1974No. 1084-2PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

On November 10, 1970, an automobile collision occurred when defendant Carl Hoffer attempted to make a left turn at the Randall Road interchange on the Aberdeen freeway in Thurston County. The driver of the vehicle involved in the collision and her passengers commenced actions against defendant Hoffer and, on the theory of respondeat superior, against defendant Morningside, Inc., a charitable corporation. Plaintiffs contend that defendant Hoffer was acting for the benefit of Morningside as its agent, and that at the time of the incident in question he was acting within the scope of the agency.

A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hollingbery v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Bollman Ex Rel. Sanderson v. Kark Rendering PlantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Scottsdale Jaycees v. SUPERIOR CT. OF MARICOPA CO.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. McLean v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Chapman v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. O'BRIEN v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. O'Brien v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Massey v. Tube Art Display, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API