Legal Opinion

McLean v. St. Regis Paper Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 17, 1972No. 330-2PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This is an action for personal injuries and damages in which the plaintiffs, Fulton and Dorothy McLean, sought to establish the vicarious liability of defend ant, St. Regis Paper Company, for the negligent actions of defendant, Alan Roland. A jury rejected plaintiff’s theories that Roland was either an employee or agent of St. Regis at the time the car he was driving rolled backward down a hill, crushing Mrs. McLean against the wall of a building. Plaintiff’s principal contention is that an agency was established as a matter of law, creating vicarious liability by application of the doctrine…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moss v. VadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Matsumura v. EilertWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fisher v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Valley Land Office, Inc. v. O'GRADYWashington Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mohr v. GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Jackson v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Baxter v. Morningside, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. O'BRIEN v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API