Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Hafer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 6, 2004No. 52485-2-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, C.J.

A master-servant relationship under agency principles may arise when one engages another to perform a task for the former’s benefit.1 In such a case, the one who seeks the benefit may either control or have the right to control the performance of the benefit.2 “ ‘It is the existence of the right of control, not its exercise, that is decisive.’ ”3 The question of agency is generally a question of fact to be decided by a jury.4 Here, a jury could find that Robert Hafer, the driver of the car who struck and injured Sharon O’Brien and Christian Pointer (O’Brien), was the agent of Breanne Miller,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Moss v. VadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. O'BRIEN v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Unruh v. CacchiottiWashington Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API