O'Brien v. Hafer
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, C.J.
A master-servant relationship under agency principles may arise when one engages another to perform a task for the former’s benefit.1 In such a case, the one who seeks the benefit may either control or have the right to control the performance of the benefit.2 “ ‘It is the existence of the right of control, not its exercise, that is decisive.’ ”3 The question of agency is generally a question of fact to be decided by a jury.4 Here, a jury could find that Robert Hafer, the driver of the car who struck and injured Sharon O’Brien and Christian Pointer (O’Brien), was the agent of Breanne Miller,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Moss v. VadmanWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Frankle v. TwedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Broyles v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- O'BRIEN v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Unruh v. CacchiottiWashington Supreme Court · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.