Legal Opinion

Womack v. Womack

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1966No. Civ. 11075PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

The trial court’s interlocutory decree granted both the husband, William, and the wife, Ann, a divorce. Neither objects to this 1 nor to the division of the nominally-valued community property. The principal controversy on appeal seethes over property the status of which the court declined to determine. Its refusal was upon the ground that the parties, as to that property, were before the court with 1 ‘unclean hands. ’ ’

Our reversal is based upon the trial court’s refusal to consider the question of what appears to us to have been a “purging ’ ’ by William of his prior conduct.

The facts are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Carman v. AthearnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Barker v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Sullivan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hillman v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Estate of BlancoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Health Maintenance Network v. Blue Cross of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Stine v. Dell'OssoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Encinas v. ClossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API