Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Sullivan

California Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1934No. Docket No. L.A. 13201PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The question here presented is:

If a woman goes through a marriage ceremony with another man after interlocutory decree but before securing a final decree of divorce from her husband, is she thereafter entitled to judgment pursuant to Civil Code, section 80, declaring such attempted marriage void, notwithstanding the fact that she had received a copy of the interlocutory decree, clearly declaring it was “not a judgment of divorce”, and should have known, and possibly did know, that she was still a married woman, and not legally capable of contracting a valid marriage.

Our answer is:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Szlauzis v. SzlauzisIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hahn v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API