Legal Opinion

Setosky v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1927No. 26,195PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate in a collision between a' school bus in which he was riding and a railway train of the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The accident occurred in Wisconsin. About four o’clock in the afternoon of November 10,1926, plaintiff’s intestate was going home from school in the school bus. The bus and a train of the defendant collided at a highway crossing and he was killed. The court charged that the driver of the bus was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Twist v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Fink v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Sweeo v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Drimel v. Union Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Kaufmann v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roth v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Doll v. ScandrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API