Legal Opinion
Doll v. Scandrett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 3, 1937No. 31,362PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 276 N.W. 281. Action for damages arising out of a collision between an automobile in which plaintiff was riding as a guest passenger and one of defendants' trains. There was a verdict in plaintiff's favor, and the appeal is taken from an order denying defendants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
The accident occurred about three o'clock in the afternoon of December 6, 1935, at a railroad crossing located at the westerly side of the village of Collis. The sedan in which plaintiff and three other persons were riding approached the crossing from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
- Morris v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Jones v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Schlarb v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maas v. Midway Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Ostrowski v. MockridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Hogue v. MassaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Garber v. RobitshekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State v. FontanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.