Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 1930No. 27,657PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 229 N.W. 797. Action by Mae Franklin, as mother and natural guardian of Jack Franklin, her minor son, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been caused to the minor by negligence on the part of the defendants. There was a trial by jury. The jury failed to agree, and thereafter, on motions by the defendants, the court ordered judgment in favor of each defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.

Jack Franklin, a boy about 15 1/2 years of age, was injured in a collision between a truck, wherein he was riding, and a freight train of the defendant railway…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Grant v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. White v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Dart v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Wetzel v. Eaton Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  4. Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Knutson v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API