Legal Opinion
Wright v. Heyne
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 14, 2003No. 01-4359PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff-Appellants Frank C. Wright, John P. Goff and Carl Krantz brought this action as Trustees of the Wright, Goff, Krantz, Harmon and Jones Profit Sharing Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a) (“ERISA”), against Vestax Securities Corporation (“Vestax”) and its owner, Michael A. Heyne, investment advisors to Plaintiffs’ Retirement Plan, alleging that Vestax and Heyne breached certain fiduciary duties in making investment decisions and engaged in conduct prohibited under ERISA…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gluck v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Bishop v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Brown v. Owens Corning Investment Review CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Zirnhelt v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.