Legal Opinion
Cataldo v. United States Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 13, 2012No. 10-3583PublishedCited by 448 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are 225 individuals currently or formerly employed at steel mills located in Lorain, Ohio. They claim that their union, employer, and plan administrator violated provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, and Ohio’s common law by intentionally misleading them regarding how pension benefits would be calculated, inducing some to retire early. The district court dismissed the claims, concluding that certain of the ERISA claims were time-barred, that the others failed to state a claim for relief, and that…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by448 opinions
- Dawn Crawford v. John TilleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Randy Pearce v. Chrysler Grp. LLC Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Regis Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Joseph Siefert v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
443 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.