Legal Opinion
Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust Company
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 3, 1985No. 84-5081PublishedCited by 178 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
Ronald Fink and Charles Kraft were participants in an employer sponsored retirement plan. Upon termination of their employment, they unsuccessfully sought to obtain benefits due under the plan. Fink and Kraft then brought suit in U.S. District Court to enforce their rights to benefits under the plan and to remedy breaches of fiduciary duty which led to the plan’s financial difficulties. The District Court held that each of the claims for relief was time-barred, and granted summary judgment for the defendants below. In construing the statute of limitations contained in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Michael E. Hubbard v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.