Legal Opinion
Grandinetti v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 22, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 179 C.D. 1984, 180 C.D. 1984, 181 C.D. 1984, 182 C.D. 1984, 183 C.D. 1984, and 184 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Palladino,
Petitioners in these consolidated cases are token unemployment compensation claimants who represent the members of the Erie Education Association (Union). In its decision below, the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed a referee’s decision denying benefits under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),1 concluding that Petitioners’ unemployment was due to a strike, rather than a lock-out by the Erie School District (District).2 For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.
In January of 1981, the Union and the District began…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Fairview School District v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Local 730 v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Behers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Acme Corrugated Box Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- AVCO Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- All American Gourmet Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Presbyterian SeniorCare v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.