Local 730 v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
We are again faced with a question of whether employees involved in a work stoppage are ineligible for unemploy*482ment compensation benefits under the terms of section 402(d) of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(d) (1964). The specific issue is whether our test for ineligibility as set forth in our decision in Vrotney Unemployment Compensation Case, 400 Pa. 440,163 A.2d 91 (1960) is to be modified where the employer’s unilateral action altering the status quo represented a “benefit” to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Fairview School District v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Odgers v. Com., Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Norwin School District v. BelanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Miceli v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Jones v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Smittle v. GatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.