Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. SULLIVAN v. Moore

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1937No. Civil No. 3824PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto in this court, instituted by the State of Arizona, on the relation of the Attorney General, against Thad M. Moore and Frank Luke as defendants, claiming that each of them unlawfully usurps, holds, and exercises the office of a tax commissioner of the State of Arizona. Defendants answered the complaint separately, raising many procedural questions by motion and demurrer, and then answered on the merits. The plaintiff demurred to the answers as not stating a defense to the complaint, and the cause was presented before us fully on oral argument, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State v. BoehringerArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Watson v. GattisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Page v. KuykendallIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wilson v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Woods v. BlockArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. LockhartArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. EnlowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Concini v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bolin v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API