Wingeart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WICKERSHAM, Judge:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company [hereinafter referred to as “State Farm”] appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County finding that the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner’s Regulations are not void as contrary to legislative intent; that Maryland’s no-fault statute does not qualify as a “state *422no-fault plan” under the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner’s Regulations; and that appellee Jerold Wingeart is entitled to proceed against State Farm for no-fault benefits under Pennsylvania’s No-fault Act. Jerold Wingeart cross appeals from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Baker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gallagher v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Klopp v. Keystone Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Rago v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Manheim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Klopp v. Keystone Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.