Legal Opinion

Wingeart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1985No. 282PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company [hereinafter referred to as “State Farm”] appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County finding that the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner’s Regulations are not void as contrary to legislative intent; that Maryland’s no-fault statute does not qualify as a “state *422no-fault plan” under the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner’s Regulations; and that appellee Jerold Wingeart is entitled to proceed against State Farm for no-fault benefits under Pennsylvania’s No-fault Act. Jerold Wingeart cross appeals from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Heffner v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Freeze v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Baker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Klopp v. Keystone Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Rago v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Manheim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Klopp v. Keystone Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API