Legal Opinion

Baker v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1982No. 561PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

The orders appealed from granted plaintiff-appellee’s motion for summary judgment in her suit against the appellant insurance company [Aetna] for work loss benefits under the Pennsylvania No-fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act [No-fault Act], 1 following the death of her husband in an automobile accident. The orders also awarded interest on the benefits to be paid at the rate of 18%, and attorney’s fees, and denied Aetna’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

Appellee [Shirleen Baker] brought suit in assumpsit, individually and as administratrix of her husband’s estate, after the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Randt v. Abex Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. LeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Tanner v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Hall v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API