Klopp v. Keystone Insurance Companies
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
The courts of this Commonwealth have, once again, been asked to consider the question of whether a material misrepresentation contained in an application for automobile insurance will permit the insurance company to rescind the policy it issued to the applicant when the misrepresentation is later discovered. In three previous decisions the answer has been in the negative and insurers have not been allowed to rescind the policy. Following the lead of these cases, we too find that an insurer who later learns of an applicant’s failure to disclose information material to the risk…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CovilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Rago v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Wingeart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klopp v. Keystone Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Erie Insurance v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Stevens v. Kemper InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Shemory v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Klopp v. Keystone Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.