State of Minnesota v. Quentin Todd Chute

OPINION

CLEARY, Chief Judge.

Appellant Quentin Todd Chute challenges his conviction for receiving stolen property. Appellant argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the warrantless search of his property, by de nying his motion to dismiss for violation of his speedy-trial right, and by holding that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction. • We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand..FACTS

On October 22, 2011, B.W.F. called the police to report that he located the camper that he had reported stolen in July 2011. An…