Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Briggs & Turivas, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 16, 1987No. C-2-86-1562PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) brought this action to recover from defendant Briggs & Turivas, Inc. shipping charges for transport of two railroad dump cars from third-party defendant Seattle & North Coast Railroad Company (“Seattle & North Coast”) to Briggs & Turivas. The matter is before the court on Conrail’s and Briggs & Turivas’ cross-motions for summary judgment.1
I. FACTS
In July 1983 Briggs & Turivas leased two railway dump cars to Seattle & North Coast, which made only about two payments under the lease/purchase…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Rudolph Express Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- E.W. Wylie Corp. v. Menard, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020