Legal Opinion
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Rudolph Express Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 15, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-C-816PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
In this action, two jointly owned interstate trucking companies, plaintiffs Schneider National Carriers, Inc., and Schneider Transport, Inc. (cohectively, “Schneider”), claim that defendants, also interstate trucking companies, are hable as consignees for freight charges arising out of dehveries Schneider made to them. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. For reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion will be granted and Schneider’s motion denied.
Jurisdiction in this court is based upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1337. 1
I. Facts
In the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marine Bank v. Taz's Trucking Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- E.W. Wylie Corp. v. Menard, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Bullocks Express Transportation, Inc. v. XL Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004
- Spray-Tek, Inc. v. Robbins Motor Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006
- Marine Bank v. Taz's Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.