Independent Acceptance Co. v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
This case arises from efforts of the State of California to amend its state plan of medical assistance under the Medicaid Act by changing its method of reimbursement for both state-operated and non-state-operated long-term care facilities. The main issue before us is whether the Secretary of Health and Human Services acted arbitrarily or capriciously in approving State Plan Amendments (“SPAs”) 90-20A and 90-20B and other subsequent amendments. We conclude that the Secretary’s approval of the SPAs at issue was neither arbitrary nor capricious.1
THE PARTIES
Plaintiff-Appellant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pinnacle Nursing Home v. AxelrodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Northwest Ecosystem Alliance v. United States Fish And Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Center for Biological Diversity v. LohnDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2003
- Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. GerritsmaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Home Builders Ass'n v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.