Legal Opinion
Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Gerritsma
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 21, 2013No. 1:12-CV-1166-PAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PANNER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs claim that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) in approving the Rio Climax Forest Management Project (the Project). The Project would allow logging on 857 acres in the BLM Medford District.
Based on the administrative record, I dismiss this action.
BACKGROUND
After completing a revised Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Project, defendant John Gerritsma, BLM field manager, concluded the Project was not a major federal action that would…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. CainDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Tolowa Nation v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Oregon Wild v. Constance CumminsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Oregon Wild v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Or. Natural Desert Ass'n v. CainDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.