Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Home Shopping Network, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 22, 1999No. CV98-6326DDP(BQRx)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF ROGERS’S APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT NATIONAL ENQUIRER’S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE
PREGERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mimi Rogers has brought a libel action against defendants. Defendant National Enquirer has filed a special motion to strike Rogers’s complaint pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16. Rogers has made an ex parte application to continue the hearing on the special motion so that she can pursue discovery. Early consideration of National Enquirer’s motion would contradict the scheme of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and therefore…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Federation v. Center for Medical ProgressCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- NYGÅRD, INC. v. Uusi-KerttulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Robinson v. Alameda CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- 3m Company v. BoulterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.