Legal Opinion
3m Company v. Boulter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 2, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1527PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff 3M Company (“3M”) has sued Defendants Lanny J. Davis, Lanny J. Davis & Associates, PLLC, Davis-Block LLC (collectively the “Davis Defendants”), and Harvey Boulter, Porton Capital Technology Funds, Porton Capital, Inc. (collectively the “Porton Defendants”) for a number of claims, including commercial defamation, tortious interference with contract and prospective business relations, and civil conspiracy. See First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).
Before the Court are the following sets of preliminary motions: 1) Defendants’ Special…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hurd v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Dc Comics v. Pacific Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Adelson v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Driscoll v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.