Legal Opinion
Ahuja v. Danzig
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 10, 2001No. 00-4223PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Chander Ahuja sued the Secretary of the Navy for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination and Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. 621, and sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, after the Navy hired a younger woman instead of him as a social worker at one of its family services centers. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Navy, concluding that Ahuja presented no evidence under the indirect burden-shifting test that the Navy’s proffered reason for not hiring him was pretextual. Ahuja appeals and we affirm.
The Navy…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Mary A. O'Regan v. Arbitration Forums, Inc., a New York Not-For-Profit Corporation, and Yvonne WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Henry WOLF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSS (AMERICA) INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Parker v. Side By Side, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014