Mohr v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was based upon an assigned claim, and a money judgment was sought. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in find ings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. From a judgment entered against the defendant in the sum of $245.60, it appeals.
The facts essential to be stated are these: The appellant, the Sun. Life Assurance Company, has its head offices in Montreal, Canada, and it does business throughout the United States and Canada. The company has a branch office in the city of Spokane. As manager of this office, one Arthur…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Livieratos v. Commonwealth Security Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Brace v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- W. E. Moses Land Scrip & Realty Co. v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schoonover v. Carpet World, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Larson v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- McKevitt v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.