Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1939No. 27392. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was based upon an assigned claim, and a money judgment was sought. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in find ings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. From a judgment entered against the defendant in the sum of $245.60, it appeals.

The facts essential to be stated are these: The appellant, the Sun. Life Assurance Company, has its head offices in Montreal, Canada, and it does business throughout the United States and Canada. The company has a branch office in the city of Spokane. As manager of this office, one Arthur…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Livieratos v. Commonwealth Security Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brace v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. W. E. Moses Land Scrip & Realty Co. v. Stack-Gibbs Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schoonover v. Carpet World, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Hoglund v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Larson v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. McKevitt v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API