Legal Opinion

Drehmel v. Radandt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1977No. 75-108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The question herein presented is whether the trial judge properly exercised his discretion when he refused to permit the plaintiffs’ amendment of a negligence complaint by adding thereto allegation of the negligent acts of two additional persons, eight years after the accident, five years after the running of the statute of limitations, and two years after plaintiffs gave notice of readiness for trial. We conclude that he did and affirm the order and judgment.

Drehmel was an employee of Henry Radandt, Inc., on November 11, 1966, when a steel beam fell from a truck which he was unloading and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Giese v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Meinshausen v. A. Gettelman Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Wipfli v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Columbus Milk Producers' Cooperative v. Department of AgricultureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Korkow v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wussow v. Commercial Mechanisms, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Biggart v. BarstadCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  4. Zobel v. FenendaelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Achtor v. Pewaukee Lake Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API