Legal Opinion
Columbus Milk Producers' Cooperative v. Department of Agriculture
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1970No. 176PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The claimants proceeded under sec. 100.06 (4), Stats. That subsection provides:
“Any person injured by the breach of any obligation under this section may file with the department a verified proof of claim. Upon receipt of such claim or any other evidence of default .... The department may demand, collect and receive from the licensee or the trustee, or from the surety . . . the amount determined to be necessary to satisfy such claims. . . .”
The Department interpreted the purchase and sale of milk as a contract which had been breached by the purchaser. The milk producers contended, and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Copland v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Kenosha Teachers Union Local 557 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Neith Co-operative Dairy Products Ass'n v. National Cheese Producers' FederationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Drehmel v. RadandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Dean Foods Co. v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- State v. Davis Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.