Legal Opinion

Wipfli v. Martin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1967PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The record, briefs, and argument of counsel suggest several issues that could be discussed, such as: Is a motion to “delete a party” a motion to strike and is it appealable? Did the defendant Fidelity waive the insufficiency of the complaint by not raising the question by demurrer or answer? Did the court err in not granting the motion to amend the complaint before trial? Did the court err in denying the motion to review its order denying the motion for leave to amend?

The crucial issue is whether the plaintiff should be permitted to amend the complaint to state a direct cause of action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schroedel v. PagelsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Kuester v. RowlandsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Turner Manufacturing Co. v. GmeinderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Girtz v. OmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Platt v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McGowan v. StoryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Soczka v. RechnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. MacH v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. Gustavson v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API