Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Graves

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1957No. 6238PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Appellants George R. Holmes and his wife appeal from a judgment entered against them in favor of Kenneth H. Graves. There is no dispute' as to the facts. Appellee is the proprietor of a grocery store in Phoenix, Arizona. Appellants ran a charge account with him for a period of more than four years prior to the institution of this action, but we are here concerned with only the last four and one-half months. The only record kept by appellee of charge accounts was on sales pads containing duplicate pages, each charge customer having a separate pad. When appellants or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Munger v. BoardmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Mulhall v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
  4. Kerby v. State Ex Rel. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Proto v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Graham v. AsburyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Decker v. HendricksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In re MH 2006-000749Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Builders Supply Corporation v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API