Holmes v. Graves
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
Appellants George R. Holmes and his wife appeal from a judgment entered against them in favor of Kenneth H. Graves. There is no dispute' as to the facts. Appellee is the proprietor of a grocery store in Phoenix, Arizona. Appellants ran a charge account with him for a period of more than four years prior to the institution of this action, but we are here concerned with only the last four and one-half months. The only record kept by appellee of charge accounts was on sales pads containing duplicate pages, each charge customer having a separate pad. When appellants or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Munger v. BoardmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Mulhall v. Nashua Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
- Kerby v. State Ex Rel. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Proto v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Graham v. AsburyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Decker v. HendricksArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- In re MH 2006-000749Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Builders Supply Corporation v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.