Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Decker v. Hendricks

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1964No. 7173PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Appellees are owners of property in Wilmot Desert Estates, a subdivision near Tucson, in Pima County, Arizona. They brought suit against appellants, seeking to have appellants vacate, abandon and remove a warehouse building in violation of certain subdivision restrictions. The superior court granted a mandatory injunction directing the removal of the building.

• In 1946, the developers of Wilmot Desert Estates filed a Declaration of Establishment of Conditions, Restrictions and Reservations, approved by the Board of Supervisors, on their Lots Five through Twelve, being…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Day v. Estate of WiswallArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Bauby v. KrasowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Riley v. StovesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Johnson v. PattisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API