Legal Opinion
Proto v. Chenoweth
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1928No. Civil No. 2688PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
— The plaintiff, W. F. Chenoweth, a regularly licensed physician, brought this action to establish a claim against the estate of the defendant’s testator, which he had previously presented to the administrator for allowance. In his complaint he alleges as the basis of his claim:
“That during the lifetime of Anton Proto, and at his instance and request, plaintiff rendered professional services to the said Anton Proto and to various other persons from June 1st, 1921, to November 1st, 19.23, and attended said deceased during his last illness, and that said services were reasonably worth the sum…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Knight v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Wise v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Irish v. BrannenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Sanborn v. DentlerWashington Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Griffith v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Marston v. DentonArizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Garcia v. SedilloArizona Supreme Court · 1950