Legal Opinion

Public Utilities Commission v. East Providence Water Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 7, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweetland, C. J.

The above entitled proceedings are-appeals from the order of the Public Utilities Commission approving as just and reasonable a proposed schedule of rates, rules and regulations filed by' the East Providence-Water Company. The first named appeal is upon the petition of the town of East Providence; the second is upon the petition of the East Providence Fire District, a quasi municipal corporation within the town of East Providence.

The order of the Commission was entered after an investigation instituted upon its own motion as to the reasonableness of said schedule of rates. The reasons of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. JasperSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rhode Island Consumers' Council v. SmithSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  2. United Gas Corp. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Public Utilities Commission v. Northwest Water Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. City of Hagerstown v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API