Legal Opinion

San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Jasper

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 6, 1903No. 193PublishedCited by 196 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a bill in equity brought in the Circuit Court against the board of supervisors'of San Diego County and others for the purpose of having certain water rates which have been fixed by the board declared void. It is alleged that the rates are so low as to amount to a taking of the plaintiff’s property without due process of law. The Circuit Court decided that it did not appear that the rates would have that effect and dismissed the bill, whereupon the plaintiff appealed to this court.

By a statute of California approved March 12, 1885, the board of supervisors of the counties are to fix…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Dow v. BeidelmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Osborne v. San Diego Land & Town Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by196 opinions

  1. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API